Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

a couple of board etiquette points

January 14, 2010 10:10AM | Re: a couple of board etiquette points
mike's comments keep the place human. and they make me laugh. mike is not spamming, unless i don't understand what the word means. and why are you going to start a fight by singling someone out. mike has been a part of this community for a long time, and in my little own opinion he's been an important part of it. and a welcome part.



The first thing that distinguishes a writer is that he is most alive when alone. - Martin Amis
January 14, 2010 11:51AM | Re: a couple of board etiquette points
thanks wc.

it would all be beside the point anyways, had there even been one.

i've moved on due to everything being fine, and also not really giving a crap.

if someone prefers me to be different, i prefer them to shut their poo spouts.

i'll leave it up to the mods as to who gets their preference first.



SaveMeASeat Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's not fair to tell people they should just go read another thread, Mike, ...



whether that's fair or not, i don't know. all i know is i never told anybody that "they should just go read another thread," savemeaseat.

> John Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> > if you're not into what somebody's saying, there are other threads to read.




> SaveMeASeat Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> unless you refrain from doing it in just about EVERY thread. Which is what you do now.



now savemeaseat. you know that's not true.

of course, my opinion of what "just about EVERY thread" means is probably different from yours.



~ i ' m g o n n a s p o o n a l l t h e j u d g e s ~



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 01/15/2010 04:21PM by mike3000.
January 19, 2010 08:34PM | Re: a couple of board etiquette points
I see M3K as the rodeo clown of the forums. When the thread is getting rough or aggro, he steps in and puts something ridiculous that makes some laugh, makes some stop arguing, and makes some go away. I would prefer any of those options than an all out fight or a pretentious poster that makes someone leave all together.

it's all good in this neighborhood.



[veganburlesque.wordpress.com] - learning to shake it till I make it.
[www.mountain-goats.com] - yo forum peeps, we've adopted a goat!
January 20, 2010 01:22AM | Re: a couple of board etiquette points
for what it is worth i have always liked mike and have pretty consistently found him hilarious



"There's good self-consciousness, and then there's toxic, paralyzing, raped-by-psychic-Bedouins self-consciousness." - David Foster Wallace
January 20, 2010 11:11AM | Re: a couple of board etiquette points
i appreciate daniellescomment. smoking smiley i bet pagliacci wouldn't have been such a sourpuss if he had just joined the rodeo. but no. he'd rather complain.

and tkpeters, i'm pretty sure we went to high school together. you were the spy in the gaberdine suit and i was the guy with the camera in my bowtie. on the day we parted, we each went out looking for america......and it looks like we ended up in the same place!

and to the rest o'yall, learn this, live this, love this.........cuz soon you'll be dead.





~ i ' m g o n n a s p o o n a l l t h e j u d g e s ~
January 22, 2010 02:47AM | Re: a couple of board etiquette points
January 22, 2010 10:34AM | Re: a couple of board etiquette points




A fly can't bird but a bird can fly.
January 22, 2010 11:08AM | Re: a couple of board etiquette points
Quote

Harmony and understanding
Sympathy and trust abounding
No more falsehoods or derisions
Golden living dreams of visions
Mystic crystal revelation
And the mind's true liberation
Aquarius! Aquarius!


then peace will guide the planets
and love will steer the stars
so let the sun shine in
let the sun shine!


people that don't dig people are a drag!



~ i ' m g o n n a s p o o n a l l t h e j u d g e s ~



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/22/2010 11:08AM by mike3000.
January 22, 2010 11:45AM | Re: a couple of board etiquette points
I dig people, and you were just being as harsh and flamebaiting at me in response, probably why you edited your posts later.

Perhaps I misspoke when I said spamming, it is more along the lines of flooding... and like it or not I think you actually took something from it. I haven't seen any thousand lined blank posts from you as of late, and that's all I could really ask for. I know this post will be met with one, I've come to terms with that, but how is that expressing yourself, how is that a portrayal of the mike we know? Even flooding with gay porn has more personality than that, but when changabang did it here it got censored (rightfully so, I'm not making an argument otherwise). I guess the devout mike followers can ascribe to the theory that it's suspense, but I don't believe it.

It's nice that you quote that song which in its first line tells you to be understanding, because I remember making a plea for it in this thread and was met with immaturity from a kid sticking his fingers in his ears going "lalalalalalala."


EDIT: Hindsight is 20/20, johnsonjohnson.



1840 - Hounds in Sonora, Mexico, invent music, write bogus "History of Music" to preserve anonymity.

Laughin Out Loud




Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 01/25/2010 10:15PM by Mr Glass.
January 22, 2010 02:26PM | Re: a couple of board etiquette points
wait, when did gay porn get censored? how come we didn't get to vote on that. ;-)



The first thing that distinguishes a writer is that he is most alive when alone. - Martin Amis
January 22, 2010 02:28PM | Re: a couple of board etiquette points
More gaysian porn please.
January 22, 2010 02:31PM | Re: a couple of board etiquette points
johnnyonthespot Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> More gaysian porn please.


Oh no. hahahaha



A fly can't bird but a bird can fly.
January 22, 2010 07:23PM | Re: a couple of board etiquette points
Mr ass Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I dig people, and you were just being as harsh and
> flamebaiting at me in response, probably why you
> edited your posts later.

if i edited my harshness reacting to your post, it was to make my post more harsh, not less. and for that, i apologize. i apologize for my mistakes, i don't edit them out. truly.

> Perhaps I misspoke

you didn't misspeak, you started shit, which was a mistake. you're not a mod, so don't tell people what to do and what not to. don't get me wrong, you can ask someone something politely, but even then, don't expect to get your way. places like this, it's a highway, and we're all drivers. you aren't a cop no matter what you think. though you probably have a cop mustache.

> when I said spamming, it is
> more along the lines of flooding... and like it or
> not I think you actually took something from it. I
> haven't seen any thousand lined blank posts from
> you as of late, and that's all I could really ask
> for.

you sound like you think i'm maliciously annoying you. i'm not. i'm just being me, and i didn't mean to annoy you. you're annoying me right now, but it's not like i'd ever tell you to knock it off, and it's not like i'm not going to get over it in just a couple seconds here. you be you, i be me. let's get past this in gentlemanandwomanly fashion, shall we?

> I know this post will be met with one, I've
> come to terms with that, but how is that
> expressing yourself, how is that a portrayal of
> the mike we know?




























































































































































































































































































































































































because it is.

> Even flooding with gay porn has
> more personality than that,

that's your opinion, asshole, and everybody's got one so yours ain't worth shit. that was my original answer to your comment. my well thought out answer is: "whatevs!"

> but when changabang

i miss changabang.

> did it here it got censored (rightfully so, I'm
> not making an argument otherwise). I guess the
> devout mike followers can ascribe to the theory
> that it's suspense, but I don't believe it.

do you care what i believe? when you do, i'll return the favor.

> It's nice that you quote that song which in its
> first line tells you to be understanding, because
> I remember making a plea for it in this thread and
> was met with immaturity from a kid sticking his
> fingers in his ears going "lalalalalalala."

"do I contradict myself? very well, then I contradict myself, i am large, i contain multitudes." so do you, and i accept that. your turn! i pasted the lyrics to that song because i was moving on, getting past what i'd said in the past, because i knew i was being harsh on you. but i already apologized for that and you don't get two.

yours wasn't a plea. it was a screed. a complaint. a bitch. a moan. a sad song. a crying shame.

and here's why.



*edited to delete one thousand blank lines......just so you know.
**i won't tell you what the other one was, try to guess!
***edited a third time to add back in one thousand blank lines before the midnight deadline. smiling smiley



~ i ' m g o n n a s p o o n a l l t h e j u d g e s ~



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 01/22/2010 09:37PM by mike3000.
January 22, 2010 07:38PM | Re: a couple of board etiquette points
Mr Glass Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I really feel this sentiment needs to be
> reinstated here.
>
> John Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 1) as with the LPTJ forum (where things get a
> > little more contentious, admittedly), a big
> > difference here is that we keep it pretty
> > positive. this means not speaking abusively to
> > people. yes, even if you feel they have spoken
> > abusively to you. I don't like having to
> regulate
> > on this, it's almost never a problem. if you're
> > not into what somebody's saying, there are
> other
> > threads to read. there are a lot of forums &
> blogs
> > where you can get aggro if that's what you're
> into
> > but I like it to be real mellow & positive
> around
> > here. ok?

you could've just stopped here and everything would've been great. you would have been thanked by me, actually!

> With John absent there has been a lax on guilting
> people who do this stuff, and it seems like it's
> turning people away from posting altogether.

read: we should guilt people who are abusive and aggro more, because that would stop people from not posting.

> I'm not saying that we should all hold hands and
> go skipping through a meadow of daisies together,

why the hell not? i think we should!

> just saying that an over-exertion of hostility is
> only gonna make you look bad.

answer hostility with hostility much?

> If you need to bitch
> on the forums, the DCL (or whatever the current
> iteration is called) is probably the best place to
> do it. Otherwise you guys will eventually end up
> no better than our resident trolls here.

you always give yourself the best advice, alice. but you very rarely follow it.

> and to people that this is happening to, more
> often than not it's probably happening for a
> reason.

if i was harsh to you, mr. glass, it was probably for a reason.

> So please, tone down on the useless
> spamming (m3k I'm looking at you),

so please, tone down the useless moderating (mr. glass i'm looking at you),

> and despite
> there being a vast and knowledgeable community at
> your hands, don't use it as your personal
> workhorse and think it absolves you of any
> responsibility to find the information on your
> own. Especially if you're new here, because that
> just sends the message across that you have no
> intent in constructively adding to this community,
> you just want what you want and will be on your
> way once you get it. Those guys are the worst.

read: get lost newbies, who needs ya! mistakes will be met with harsh judgement from mr. glass!

> I'll get off my soapbox now,

a tirade is not a plea, and vice versa. dictionary.com.

> I just thought it'd
> be good to put my feelings out there.

i did, but you didn't think that was so good! i guess you get the privilege to be you, and others don't. oh well. BARRRRF.

> Nobody's gonna be completely innocent of it, you
> should just not let it cosume your every post.

you first.

ok, now me.

don't tell people not to trespass when you're fishing where you ain't supposed to.

there.

i said it.

i'll get off my soapbox now.



~ i ' m g o n n a s p o o n a l l t h e j u d g e s ~
January 22, 2010 07:41PM | Re: a couple of board etiquette points
how about we just reset at midnight, forget all this bullshit, and be all better tomorrow?

it probably doesn't go here, and i know for a fact we're better than this.



~ i ' m g o n n a s p o o n a l l t h e j u d g e s ~
January 22, 2010 07:53PM | Re: a couple of board etiquette points
I don't think the post you last responded to was directed at you. Well, I know it wasn't directed at you, but I don't really feel like naming names.

As usual, I don't really know or care what's going on in any thread that's not expressly about Sweden or the DCL, I just thought I would clarify based on the few posts I have read.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/22/2010 07:54PM by johnnyonthespot.
January 22, 2010 08:25PM | Re: a couple of board etiquette points
Quote
Mike3k
and i know for a fact we're better than this.

I totally know for a FACT that you are both better than this!

But now, the way I see it, there is only ONE WAY to solve this....





A fly can't bird but a bird can fly.
January 22, 2010 09:25PM | Re: a couple of board etiquette points
i'm down!

i was hoping mr. glass would point out the irony of me telling him not to tell me what to do.

you know.

a peaceful meeting of the minds.

psych patient to psych patient.

but dancing it is.

to keep from crying!

[www.youtube.com]

from laughter!



~ i ' m g o n n a s p o o n a l l t h e j u d g e s ~



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/22/2010 09:26PM by mike3000.
January 23, 2010 01:29AM | Re: a couple of board etiquette points
just my 2 cents on the complaints about mike...

i usually find his posts useless and annoying (not trying to offend you here, man, i promise). but guess what?! i don't have to read his posts. and neither do you. if mike posts on a thread that i'm reading, i usually just scroll down past his post til the next one. simple enough.



Quote
John
it was actually 2 7"s btw and the mastering date was 5/1, I cancelled it this a.m.
This is why you should be nice to everyone.
January 23, 2010 01:38AM | Re: a couple of board etiquette points
i can appreciate your sentiments, acow. no offense taken.

glad i didn't just scroll down past your post til the next one! spinning smiley sticking its tongue out



~ i ' m g o n n a s p o o n a l l t h e j u d g e s ~



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/23/2010 01:42AM by mike3000.
January 23, 2010 09:06AM | Re: a couple of board etiquette points
Protection
For Gangs, Clubs And Nations
Causing Grief In Human Relations
It's A Turf War
On A Global Scale
I'd Rather Hear Both Sides
Of The Tale
See, It's Not About Races
Just Places
Faces
Where Your Blood Comes From
Is Where Your Space Is
I've Seen The Bright Get Duller
I'm Not Going To Spend
My Life Being A Color

Don't Tell Me You Agree With Me
When I Saw You Kicking Dirt In My Eye

But, If You're Thinkin' About My Baby Forums
It Don't Matter If You're Black Or White





[veganburlesque.wordpress.com] - learning to shake it till I make it.
[www.mountain-goats.com] - yo forum peeps, we've adopted a goat!




Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/23/2010 09:07AM by daniellescomment.
January 24, 2010 05:51PM | Re: a couple of board etiquette points
February 21, 2010 01:19AM | Re: a couple of board etiquette points
p'raps instead of nastiness, this thread can take a turn for the better and maybe john can come on back and see some nice stuff on here for a change.

I LOVE ALL Y'ALLS AND ALL YER DIFFERENCES THAT AMOUNT TO SAMENESSES.

can ye say the same wit me?

this place is even steven, as far as i'm concerned, and should always be. ain't that america? the home of the free?

and yeah, i been drinkin. so fuckin what.

see, i hate the ones i love. they FORCE me to love them by just existing as they are. now, if they were to ever be different from what they were, which they couldn't, because you are you no matter what you do, then i might have to rethink things.

but as things are, this place is a place to go that exists and i love it because it's here.

and anything that needs more than that can drink dick polyp juice.

what i means is, FUKKIT. who cares. we're all gonna be worm food real soon in the grand scheme.

love and hate equally, as long as they last only a moment each.

and the long slogs between should be filled with the mountain goats.

amen and god bless whoever thought of red wine.



~ i ' m g o n n a s p o o n a l l t h e j u d g e s ~
February 21, 2010 07:40AM | Re: a couple of board etiquette points
Oh my. That may be one of my favoritest posts ever!

Tis true though, if it wasn't for finding this place (a year and a half ago !!) I wouldn't have very many friends. But as it stands, thanx to these forums, I have a bunch of really wonderful friends from all over the world! From England (even if they don't consider me a friend anymore), to Burbank, to San Jose, to Seattle, to Portland, to Ohio, to St. Louis, to Philly, to Chicago, to Kentucky... and all points in between! I love that I have so many people to share things with even if it is just online.

So, yup, I know I am really super thankful that this place exists. My life would be a whole lot emptier without it.


PS: Oh and Mike, check yer email. thumbs down



A fly can't bird but a bird can fly.
February 21, 2010 07:41PM | Re: a couple of board etiquette points
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 19
Record Number of Users: 8 on May 22, 2013
Record Number of Guests: 40 on May 24, 2013