aw man. This is a long story which results in this comment.
So I was looking on Spotify to find All Hail West Texas to listen to whilst I do work. (I have no money to buy music right now, so I'm living with Spotify for the time being) But that album isn't there so I was looking for it online and on the wikipedia site saw mention of 15 outtakes from the album which were supposed to be released free but weren't after Hail and Farewell Gothenburg, so I look up HaFG and download it (I have this irritating curiousity) and then I'm like, hang on, need to find out more about it so I'm reading most of this thread, and I'm going:
"Well, yeah, he didn't want people to hear it and now some have and some haven't, but he's now got rid of other ones which, in the future, people may have heard. Isn't that kind of unfair to the people who won't download or listen to it?"
Which I guess it is, but then all of that stuff is his music anyway, so whatever he does with it is what he wants, right?
But, then again, if everyone had followed what people said to the letter, we wouldn't have Kafka or Keats or Emily Dickinson or a bucket-load of other works to... um, work with. And the album won't be bad, so much, but it might not be very good either.
The thing is, I've lived so far without it. A very small amount of time I've lived with the knowledge of it. John Darnielle doesn't want people to download it, or listen to it. I'll feel like the most selfish person in the world if I listen to it after he's been so nice about it all. But is it selfish just to have it right now, and not listen to it until he gives it the okay? But he's not going to give it the okay, I know that, so essentially I'm just keeping it, raising the chances of me hearing it, making me (still) the most selfish person in the world. Ugh. This is horrible. I listened to Taboo VI, btw, because he seemed to be okay with that.
(And I still can't find a place I can listen to All Hail West Texas, so I guess I'll just have to save up for it.)