December 21, 2011 06:23AM | Remastering Permission Agreement - John or legal representative please read
|
Registered: 1 year ago Posts: 1 |
December 21, 2011 09:23AM | Re: Remastering Permission Agreement - John or legal representative please read
|
Registered: 5 years ago Posts: 2,227 |
December 22, 2011 02:06AM | Re: Remastering Permission Agreement - John or legal representative please read
|
Registered: 4 years ago Posts: 1,801 |
Quote
Reed
Quote
MindoverMattjr
The recording is terrible
actually the recordings are how john wanted the recordings to sound, it was an aesthetic choice. personally I prefer the old sound. you could certainly email his manager / agent to ask, but I don't think they'd be in favor of this...
December 22, 2011 06:12AM | Re: Remastering Permission Agreement - John or legal representative please read
|
Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 1,302 |
Quote
Reed
Quote
MindoverMattjr
The recording is terrible
actually the recordings are how john wanted the recordings to sound, it was an aesthetic choice.
December 22, 2011 07:22PM | Re: Remastering Permission Agreement - John or legal representative please read
|
Registered: 2 years ago Posts: 73 |
i think it was more of an aesthetical thing, he mentions using different kinds of shitty tape recorders in his songs and liner notes, if it was purely a cost thing, he probably wouldn't have taken the care to record songs on several subtly different shitty tape recordersQuote
EvilEivind
Quote
Reed
Quote
MindoverMattjr
The recording is terrible
actually the recordings are how john wanted the recordings to sound, it was an aesthetic choice.
I thought it was as much due to him not being able to afford fancy recording equipment or time in a studio? I know I've seen / read / heard him talk about how recording on a boombox today wouldn't be like it was back in the day, that today it would be a self-imposed limitation rather than something you'd do out of necessity.
I like the lo-fi sound as much as the next guy, though.
December 24, 2011 01:42PM | Re: Remastering Permission Agreement - John or legal representative please read
|
Registered: 4 years ago Posts: 1,801 |
December 25, 2011 09:02PM | Re: Remastering Permission Agreement - John or legal representative please read
|
Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 1,321 |
January 08, 2012 06:56PM | Re: Remastering Permission Agreement - John or legal representative please read
|
Registered: 1 year ago Posts: 3 |
January 08, 2012 11:25PM | Re: Remastering Permission Agreement - John or legal representative please read
|
Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 1,302 |
January 09, 2012 07:21PM | Re: Remastering Permission Agreement - John or legal representative please read
|
Registered: 2 years ago Posts: 533 |
January 09, 2012 07:33PM | Re: Remastering Permission Agreement - John or legal representative please read
|
Registered: 5 years ago Posts: 4,589 |
January 09, 2012 08:48PM | Re: Remastering Permission Agreement - John or legal representative please read
|
Registered: 2 years ago Posts: 533 |
January 09, 2012 10:39PM | Re: Remastering Permission Agreement - John or legal representative please read
|
Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 1,302 |
Quote
simonfox
I like how people on this board can't even agree to disagree about why John used a particular device to record. No wonder JW left.
January 10, 2012 06:16PM | Re: Remastering Permission Agreement - John or legal representative please read
|
Registered: 2 years ago Posts: 533 |
Quote
EvilEivind
Quote
simonfox
I like how people on this board can't even agree to disagree about why John used a particular device to record. No wonder JW left.
Not exactly a heated debate though! Personally I think it's an interesting thing to discuss, and trying to dig up evidence the lends credibility to the one view or the other. Could probably make for an interesting essay.